VQV Signal

CREATOR TOOLS WATCH PRACTICAL

Developers split on Gemini 4 Carbon's real-world speed and cost a day after launch

According to a post on X by @theo, Gemini 4 Carbon is "unacceptably slow" in practice. The post times one task at 22m21s on Carbon low versus 9m33s on Claude Opus 5.5 high. It also argues that Claude Opus 5.5 xhigh is cheaper per real-world task than any Carbon effort level, disputing claims that Carbon is the most cost-efficient flagship. @martin_casado takes the other side, but the snippet cuts off before his full argument.

Source: Scobleizer News Pulse (X) · x.com Found via Robert Scoble’s Scobleizer News Pulse · a post on X, not independently verified Published 2026-11-11T20:45:00+00:00 Detected 2026-11-12T06:18:25+00:00
View original source

According to a post on X by @theo, Gemini 4 Carbon is "unacceptably slow" in practice. The post times one task at 22m21s on Carbon low versus 9m33s on Claude Opus 5.5 high. It also argues that Claude Opus 5.5 xhigh is cheaper per real-world task than any Carbon effort level, disputing claims that Carbon is the most cost-efficient flagship. @martin_casado takes the other side, but the snippet cuts off before his full argument.

AI-assisted summary based on the listed source.

@theo calls Carbon "unacceptably slow" in practice, timing a task at 22m21s on Carbon low versus 9m33s on Claude Opus 5.5 high, and argues Opus 5.5 xhigh is cheaper per real-world task than any Carbon effort level, disputing claims that Carbon is the most cost-efficient flagship. On the other side, @martin_casado...

Teams choosing between models need to weigh speed, effort level and cost per task, not just headline claims. These are single-task timings from one post, so they do not show how Carbon performs across a wider range of work. Watch for more side-by-side timing and cost data from other developers, and for the full reasoning behind Casado's view.

Check the actual price, availability, and account limits before assuming the change applies to you.

Signal Strength 95% Technical label WATCH Public Interest 59 Category CREATOR TOOLS Reader Depth PRACTICAL

Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.

Public Interest components
Recognizable Entity Score 90 Practical Impact Score 38 Novelty Interest Score 94 Consequence Score 18 Curiosity Score 0 Shareability Score 72

VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to Consumer AI, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).