VQV Signal

RESEARCH WATCH TECHNICAL

Red-teamed evaluation kit for small Gemma 4 coding agents published on arXiv

A paper on arXiv describes drydock-eval, a local evaluation kit for small coding agents, tested on Gemma 4 E4B. The authors say a hosted score in the Gemma 4 Developer Agent competition is one noisy number, so they built a local evaluator that is fast, safe for agent-written code, and matches the hosted scorer's prompts. According to the source, the kit evaluates the agent at about 250 runs per hour on one RTX 5090. Its Contain component runs each job in a fresh container without network access and passed 200 scripted escape tests.

Source: arXiv · arxiv.org Published 2026-11-12T08:54:03+00:00 Detected 2026-11-13T18:17:19+00:00
View original source

A paper on arXiv describes drydock-eval, a local evaluation kit for small coding agents, tested on Gemma 4 E4B. The authors say a hosted score in the Gemma 4 Developer Agent competition is one noisy number, so they built a local evaluator that is fast, safe for agent-written code, and matches the hosted scorer's prompts. According to the source, the kit evaluates the agent at about 250 runs per hour on one RTX 5090. Its Contain component runs each job in a fresh container without network access and passed 200 scripted escape tests.

AI-assisted summary based on the listed source.

A hosted score in the Gemma 4 Developer Agent competition is one noisy number, so development needs a local evaluator that is fast, safe for agent-written code, and matching the hosted scorer's prompts. drydock-eval evaluates a small coding agent (Gemma 4 E4B) at about 250 runs per hour on one RTX 5090. Contain...

Developers building or benchmarking small coding agents may get a way to test locally before relying on a single hosted leaderboard score. Teams that need sandboxed execution of agent-written code can look at the containment approach and its escape-test results. The source snippet is cut off before describing the full set of components, so the complete scope and results should be checked in the paper.

Signal Strength 93% Technical label WATCH Public Interest 22 Category RESEARCH Reader Depth TECHNICAL

Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.

Public Interest components
Recognizable Entity Score 0 Practical Impact Score 20 Novelty Interest Score 48 Consequence Score 34 Curiosity Score 16 Shareability Score 21

VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to AI Agents, connected to arXiv.