Summary
According to a post on X by @philiptorr, his group at Oxford and SoftServe released the TRAP benchmark. It hid instructions using Cialdini's persuasion tactics, such as fake admin notices and claims that "others already did this," inside realistic web pages. Across six models, about 25% of attempts worked. Attacks that fooled GPT-5, the hardest target at 13%, fooled weaker models 81–90% of the time.
AI-assisted summary based on the listed source.
What happened
Oxford's @philiptorr shared the TRAP benchmark from his group and SoftServe, which hid instructions using Cialdini's persuasion tactics (fake admin notices, "others already did this") in realistic web pages. Across six models about 25% of attempts worked, and attacks that fooled GPT-5, the hardest target at 13%,...
Why it matters
Teams building AI agents that browse the web or act on pages may need to test for social-engineering-style prompt injection, not just obvious hidden commands. The post suggests the hardest model was not immune and that results can transfer to weaker models. Watch for the full TRAP paper and any published details on the fake-button results, which the snippet cuts off.
Signal Intelligence
Signal Strength 91%
Technical label WATCH
Public Interest 34
Category SECURITY
Reader Depth TECHNICAL
Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.
Public Interest components
Recognizable Entity Score 0
Practical Impact Score 8
Novelty Interest Score 94
Consequence Score 46
Curiosity Score 16
Shareability Score 46
Why this is here
VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to AI Security, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).