VQV Signal

ROBOTS & HARDWARE WATCH TECHNICAL

Post says attention-residual model layer queries largely reject all but token embeddings

According to a post on X by @HeMuyu0327, in an AttnRes-style model the raw cosine similarity between layer queries and earlier layer outputs is negative for almost every layer except the token embedding. The post says MLP outputs are consistently rejected as well. The author argues that softmax-ed query weights hide this pattern and that such models may not use token embeddings to their full potential. The work is described as ongoing, with a blog write-up mentioned.

Source: Scobleizer News Pulse (X) · x.com Found via Robert Scoble’s Scobleizer News Pulse · a post on X, not independently verified Published 2026-10-30T04:35:00+00:00 Detected 2026-10-30T13:31:36+00:00
View original source

According to a post on X by @HeMuyu0327, in an AttnRes-style model the raw cosine similarity between layer queries and earlier layer outputs is negative for almost every layer except the token embedding. The post says MLP outputs are consistently rejected as well. The author argues that softmax-ed query weights hide this pattern and that such models may not use token embeddings to their full potential. The work is described as ongoing, with a blog write-up mentioned.

AI-assisted summary based on the listed source.

Muyu He reports that in an AttnRes-style model, the raw cosine similarity between layer queries and earlier layer outputs is negative for almost every layer except the token embedding, while MLP outputs are consistently rejected. He argues that softmax-ed query weights hide this, and that such models may not use...

The claim comes from a single social post describing ongoing work, so it has not been independently confirmed. Researchers designing attention-based and residual architectures are the readers most affected, since the claim points to a possible gap in how token embeddings are used. The promised blog write-up would show the underlying analysis and whether the pattern holds across models.

Hardware and robotics watchers may want to track whether this becomes a product, benchmark, or deployment signal.

Signal Strength 88% Technical label WATCH Public Interest 23 Category ROBOTS & HARDWARE Reader Depth TECHNICAL

Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.

Public Interest components
Recognizable Entity Score 0 Practical Impact Score 0 Novelty Interest Score 70 Consequence Score 30 Curiosity Score 0 Shareability Score 41

VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to AI Chips, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).