VQV Signal
According to a post on X by @draginol, he runs 101 agents on one of four machines and compares the setup to leading game projects with more than 100 people. He says much of his time goes to reviewing proposals and plans. He credits the Exhibits feature in Clairvoyance, where the agents produce exhibits for him to review, and describes himself as an extreme user. This is one user's account, not an independent test of the tool.
According to a post on X by @draginol, he runs 101 agents on one of four machines and compares the setup to leading game projects with more than 100 people. He says much of his time goes to reviewing proposals and plans. He credits the Exhibits feature in Clairvoyance, where the agents produce exhibits for him to review, and describes himself as an extreme user. This is one user's account, not an independent test of the tool.
AI-assisted summary based on the listed source.
@draginol said he runs 101 agents on one of four machines and compared it to leading game projects with 100+ people, where much of his time went to reviewing proposals and plans. He credited Clairvoyance's Exhibits feature, where the agents make exhibits for him to review, and called himself an extreme user. Why...
The post suggests that heavy users of agent tools may spend much of their time on oversight, such as reviewing outputs and plans, rather than on direct work. Teams planning to run many agents may need to think about review workflows and how work gets checked. Watch for whether other heavy users report similar experiences with Clairvoyance or comparable tools.
VQV organizes public signals from inspectable sources. It does not independently verify the underlying report.
Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.
VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to AI Search, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).
No login, cookies, social SDKs, or automatic posting.
