VQV Signal
According to a post on X by @WesRoth, a GitHub-funded Artificial Analysis evaluation found that Copilot Fusion Max, which selects and coordinates several models for each coding task, scored two points behind Claude Code running Opus 5.5. The post says Copilot Fusion Max cost $5.59 per task, compared with $11.42 for Claude Code. It also quotes Scott Hanselman saying he has been using Copilot Fusion for weeks and that it is very good.
According to a post on X by @WesRoth, a GitHub-funded Artificial Analysis evaluation found that Copilot Fusion Max, which selects and coordinates several models for each coding task, scored two points behind Claude Code running Opus 5.5. The post says Copilot Fusion Max cost $5.59 per task, compared with $11.42 for Claude Code. It also quotes Scott Hanselman saying he has been using Copilot Fusion for weeks and that it is very good.
AI-assisted summary based on the listed source.
In a GitHub-funded Artificial Analysis evaluation, Copilot Fusion Max, which picks and coordinates several models for each coding task, scored two points behind Claude Code running Opus 5.5 while costing $5.59 per task against $11.42. Scott Hanselman said he's been using it for weeks and it's very good. Also:...
Developers and engineering teams comparing AI coding tools on cost and performance now have one data point to consider. Because the evaluation was funded by GitHub, readers should check the full methodology and look for independent testing before drawing conclusions.
Teams using AI at work may want to compare this against current productivity and review workflows.
VQV organizes public signals from inspectable sources. It does not independently verify the underlying report.
Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.
VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to AI Coding Tools, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).
No login, cookies, social SDKs, or automatic posting.
