VQV Signal
According to a post on X by @tomjohndesign, after two weeks of testing and failing to get AI to draw correct interchanges on transit maps, he now has a pipeline that gets "unreasonably close." Circles in his demo mark errors the process found, and it retests those checks with each tweak to the build. He describes the work as a side project, and the demo is a video that cannot be watched in the source snippet.
According to a post on X by @tomjohndesign, after two weeks of testing and failing to get AI to draw correct interchanges on transit maps, he now has a pipeline that gets "unreasonably close." Circles in his demo mark errors the process found, and it retests those checks with each tweak to the build. He describes the work as a side project, and the demo is a video that cannot be watched in the source snippet.
AI-assisted summary based on the listed source.
@tomjohndesign said that after two weeks of testing and failing to get AI to draw correct interchanges on maps, he now has a pipeline that gets "unreasonably close." Circles in his demo mark errors his process found, which it keeps retesting with each tweak to the build. He called it a side project; the demo is a...
The post points to a way of pairing AI-generated diagrams with automated checks that rerun after every change, which may interest designers and developers working on transit or map graphics. The claim comes from a single side project shared on X, so its accuracy and how well it scales are not established here. Watch for a fuller write-up or a viewable demo that shows how the error checks perform.
VQV organizes public signals from inspectable sources. It does not independently verify the underlying report.
Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.
VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to AI Chips, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).
No login, cookies, social SDKs, or automatic posting.
