Summary
According to a post on X by @raunofreiberg, he avoids asking LLMs for copy or visual mockups. He says their basic patterns and clichés "poison" his thinking and make it harder to design or write beyond the average. In a follow-up, he said a novel take on what a website can be would make him more likely to hire someone than ten side projects "prompted together with no thought," quoting a viral post about the personal web. The source is a short excerpt, so the full context of the posts is not available here.
AI-assisted summary based on the listed source.
What happened
@raunofreiberg said he avoids asking LLMs for copy or visual mocks because their basic patterns and clichés "poison" his thinking and make it harder to design or write beyond the average. In a follow-up, he said a novel take on what a website can be would make him more likely to hire someone than ten side projects...
Why it matters
This is one designer's personal view, not a survey or industry finding. It raises questions for designers, hiring managers and portfolio reviewers about whether AI-generated work flattens originality and how creative work should be judged. Watch whether other designers describe similar limits on AI use in their creative process.
Signal Intelligence
Signal Strength 78%
Technical label WATCH
Public Interest 20
Category DEVELOPING
Reader Depth TECHNICAL
Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.
Public Interest components
Recognizable Entity Score 0
Practical Impact Score 0
Novelty Interest Score 70
Consequence Score 10
Curiosity Score 0
Shareability Score 41
Why this is here
VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to AI Search, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).
