VQV Signal

BIG MOVE WATCH TECHNICAL

Altman says OpenAI's Navier-Stokes proof cost about $10M in compute

According to a post on X by @tanayj, Sam Altman said on the Cheeky Pint podcast with @collision that the compute behind OpenAI's Navier-Stokes proof cost on the order of $10 million. He said that with better models and agent swarms, the work could be redone from scratch for about 1/100th of that within a year. In a separate clip, Altman said what he wants from AI agents is simple: they should just work. The post's snippet is partial, so the full context of these remarks is not shown here.

Source: Scobleizer News Pulse (X) · x.com Found via Robert Scoble’s Scobleizer News Pulse · a post on X, not independently verified Published 2026-11-01T04:45:00+00:00 Detected 2026-11-01T10:18:49+00:00
View original source

According to a post on X by @tanayj, Sam Altman said on the Cheeky Pint podcast with @collision that the compute behind OpenAI's Navier-Stokes proof cost on the order of $10 million. He said that with better models and agent swarms, the work could be redone from scratch for about 1/100th of that within a year. In a separate clip, Altman said what he wants from AI agents is simple: they should just work. The post's snippet is partial, so the full context of these remarks is not shown here.

AI-assisted summary based on the listed source.

On the Cheeky Pint podcast with @collision, Sam Altman said the compute behind OpenAI's Navier-Stokes proof cost on the order of $10 million. He said that with better models and agent swarms it could be redone from scratch for about 1/100th of that within a year. In a separate clip, he says what he wants from AI...

The cost figure is an estimate from OpenAI's CEO, not a published cost breakdown in the source material. For builders and businesses weighing agent-based workflows, the cost trend Altman describes is the number to track. Watch for independent figures or an actual redo of the work that would test the one-year, 1/100th claim.

Signal Strength 88% Technical label WATCH Public Interest 42 Category BIG MOVE Reader Depth TECHNICAL

Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.

Public Interest components
Recognizable Entity Score 73 Practical Impact Score 0 Novelty Interest Score 70 Consequence Score 18 Curiosity Score 16 Shareability Score 57

VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to AI Agents, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).