VQV Signal

RESEARCH WATCH TECHNICAL

Paper reports 0.1% pretraining data poisoning can plant a backdoor that survives agent training

According to a post on X by @xyVickyHu, an Anthropic Fellows paper titled "Agentic Backdoors via Pretraining Poisoning" reports that poisoning 0.1% of pretraining data can plant a remote-code backdoor. The authors, including Carlini, Jagielski and Rando, pretrained Qwen3 models from scratch at 0.6B to 4B parameters on 100B FineWeb tokens, then turned them into agents. The post states the backdoor survives subsequent agent training. The paper is listed on arXiv as 2610.37741.

Source: Scobleizer News Pulse (X) · x.com Found via Robert Scoble’s Scobleizer News Pulse · a post on X, not independently verified Published 2026-11-04T20:20:00+00:00 Detected 2026-11-05T02:24:47+00:00
View original source

According to a post on X by @xyVickyHu, an Anthropic Fellows paper titled "Agentic Backdoors via Pretraining Poisoning" reports that poisoning 0.1% of pretraining data can plant a remote-code backdoor. The authors, including Carlini, Jagielski and Rando, pretrained Qwen3 models from scratch at 0.6B to 4B parameters on 100B FineWeb tokens, then turned them into agents. The post states the backdoor survives subsequent agent training. The paper is listed on arXiv as 2610.37741.

AI-assisted summary based on the listed source.

"Agentic Backdoors via Pretraining Poisoning," by Xinyan Hu, Pingbang Hu, Xuanli He, Yiming Zhang and co-authors including Carlini, Jagielski and Rando, pretrains Qwen3 models from scratch at 0.6B to 4B parameters on 100B FineWeb tokens, then turns them into agents; the backdoor survives subsequent agent training....

Teams that build agents on open models trained from public web data may need to consider whether a backdoor planted in pretraining can persist through later training. The paper's claim is that it can in this setup, which makes data provenance a question for anyone relying on third-party base models. Readers should watch for the full paper's methods and any independent replication.

Signal Strength 90% Technical label WATCH Public Interest 30 Category RESEARCH Reader Depth TECHNICAL

Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.

Public Interest components
Recognizable Entity Score 0 Practical Impact Score 8 Novelty Interest Score 94 Consequence Score 34 Curiosity Score 16 Shareability Score 26

VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to Open Source LLMs, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).