On the upgraded index (FrontierCode 2.0 and Terminal-Bench 4.1), Fable 5.2 and Opus 5.5 tie at 58, scores on the harder FrontierCode fell from a 45% average to 29%, and Kimi Code CLI with Kimi K3.1 Pro leads Terminal-Bench at 68%. Claude Code with Fable 5....
VQV Signal
AI AT WORK
WATCH
TECHNICAL
Artificial Analysis’ new Coding Agent Index puts Claude Fable 5.2 and Opus 5.5 level at the top
On the upgraded index (FrontierCode 2.0 and Terminal-Bench 4.1), Fable 5.2 and Opus 5.5 tie at 58, scores on the harder FrontierCode fell from a 45% average to 29%, and Kimi Code CLI with Kimi K3.1 Pro leads Terminal-Bench at 68%. Claude Code with Fable 5....
On the upgraded index (FrontierCode 2.0 and Terminal-Bench 4.1), Fable 5.2 and Opus 5.5 tie at 58, scores on the harder FrontierCode fell from a 45% average to 29%, and Kimi Code CLI with Kimi K3.1 Pro leads Terminal-Bench at 68%. Claude Code with Fable 5.2 costs $2.89 per task at medium effort versus $1.51 for...
Teams using AI at work may want to compare this against current productivity and review workflows.
VQV organizes public signals from inspectable sources. It does not independently verify the underlying report.
Signal Strength 85%
Technical label WATCH
Public Interest 47
Category AI AT WORK
Reader Depth TECHNICAL
Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.
Public Interest components
Recognizable Entity Score 60
Practical Impact Score 8
Novelty Interest Score 94
Consequence Score 30
Curiosity Score 16
Shareability Score 59
VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to AI Coding Tools, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).
No login, cookies, social SDKs, or automatic posting.