A poster relays someone else's test on two repos with 105 planted bugs: GPT-6.1 Terra scored 40.7 at max effort versus 32 for GPT-5.6 Terra at max, but only 11.3 at xhigh and 9.7 at high. There is no linked write-up or method, so treat the numbers as...
VQV Signal
Early GPT-6.1 Terra hands-on: a secondhand planted-bug test shows max effort far ahead of xhigh (unverified)
A poster relays someone else's test on two repos with 105 planted bugs: GPT-6.1 Terra scored 40.7 at max effort versus 32 for GPT-5.6 Terra at max, but only 11.3 at xhigh and 9.7 at high. There is no linked write-up or method, so treat the numbers as...
A poster relays someone else's test on two repos with 105 planted bugs: GPT-6.1 Terra scored 40.7 at max effort versus 32 for GPT-5.6 Terra at max, but only 11.3 at xhigh and 9.7 at high. There is no linked write-up or method, so treat the numbers as unverified. Original post on X Section: Models & Releases
VQV organizes public signals from inspectable sources. It does not independently verify the underlying report.
Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.
Public Interest components
VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to Developer Tools, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).
No login, cookies, social SDKs, or automatic posting.