Summary
According to a post on X by @Plinz, Joscha Bach argues it is "absolutely ridiculous" in 2026 that AI agents still talk to each other in human language about how to write code in programming languages built for humans. The post is a short statement of opinion, and the source does not describe a specific proposal, experiment or alternative protocol. The item appears in the Scobleizer News Pulse feed, which describes Bach as a prominent AI thinker pressing the industry on agent-to-agent protocols beyond natural language.
AI-assisted summary based on the listed source.
What happened
Joscha Bach argues it is “absolutely ridiculous” in 2026 that AI agents still talk to each other in human language about how to write code in programming languages built for humans. Why it matters: A prominent AI thinker is pressing the industry on agent-to-agent protocols beyond natural language. Original post on X
Why it matters
Developers and companies building multi-agent systems may want to track whether agent-to-agent communication moves beyond natural language toward formats designed for machines. The source gives no concrete design, timeline or named alternative, so any practical change is not yet clear. Watch for specific protocols or follow-up statements from Bach or other agent builders.
Signal Intelligence
Signal Strength 86%
Technical label WATCH
Public Interest 22
Category DEVELOPING
Reader Depth TECHNICAL
Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.
Public Interest components
Recognizable Entity Score 0
Practical Impact Score 0
Novelty Interest Score 70
Consequence Score 18
Curiosity Score 16
Shareability Score 41
Why this is here
VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to AI Agents, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).
