VQV Signal

AI AT WORK WATCH TECHNICAL

Meta releases Muse Ember, its smallest and cheapest model, built for agents' routine work

According to a post on X by @AIatMeta, Meta has released Muse Ember, its smallest and cheapest model, aimed at the routine work of AI agents. The source says it costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens, with a 1M-token context window, and handles tool calls, coding subtasks and document parsing. Artificial Analysis reportedly scores it level with Claude Haiku 5.5 at about a third of the cost per task, though with weaker knowledge recall. Cloudflare and Box were among those offering it on day one.

Source: Scobleizer News Pulse (X) · x.com Found via Robert Scoble’s Scobleizer News Pulse · a post on X, not independently verified Published 2026-11-09T21:30:00+00:00 Detected 2026-11-10T02:18:36+00:00
View original source

According to a post on X by @AIatMeta, Meta has released Muse Ember, its smallest and cheapest model, aimed at the routine work of AI agents. The source says it costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens, with a 1M-token context window, and handles tool calls, coding subtasks and document parsing. Artificial Analysis reportedly scores it level with Claude Haiku 5.5 at about a third of the cost per task, though with weaker knowledge recall. Cloudflare and Box were among those offering it on day one.

AI-assisted summary based on the listed source.

Muse Ember costs $0.10/$0.50 per million input/output tokens with a 1M-token context and handles tool calls, coding subtasks and document parsing; Artificial Analysis scores it level with Claude Haiku 5.5 at about a third of the cost per task, though with weaker knowledge recall. Cloudflare, Box and others offered...

Developers and businesses running agents that work continuously could see lower costs if Muse Ember performs as the comparison suggests. The weaker knowledge recall means it may fit routine tasks better than tasks that depend on broad factual answers. Watch for independent testing beyond the Artificial Analysis comparison and for whether other providers respond with similar pricing.

Teams using AI at work may want to compare this against current productivity and review workflows.

Signal Strength 88% Technical label WATCH Public Interest 50 Category AI AT WORK Reader Depth TECHNICAL

Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.

Public Interest components
Recognizable Entity Score 51 Practical Impact Score 38 Novelty Interest Score 94 Consequence Score 18 Curiosity Score 16 Shareability Score 63

VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to Consumer AI, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).