VQV Signal

RESEARCH WATCH TECHNICAL

Paper reports many small agent teams beat lone agents or one big team on long tasks

According to a post on X by @SciFi, a new paper by Junlin Wang, Haozhe Chen, Ang Li, Rahul Chalamala and Zhuang Liu, from Duke, Modal Labs, Princeton and NYU, studies how to allocate test-time compute across agents. The approach samples many small teams that share a forum and keeps the best team's result. Using Qwen3.8-27B with a budget of 100 agents, ten teams of ten beat 100 independent agents on 10 of 12 long-horizon tasks, and beat one team of 100 on all four tasks where that was run. A manager-led variant is also mentioned, but the snippet cuts off before giving its results.

Source: Scobleizer News Pulse (X) · x.com Found via Robert Scoble’s Scobleizer News Pulse · a post on X, not independently verified Published 2026-11-11T14:55:00+00:00 Detected 2026-11-11T22:23:48+00:00
View original source

According to a post on X by @SciFi, a new paper by Junlin Wang, Haozhe Chen, Ang Li, Rahul Chalamala and Zhuang Liu, from Duke, Modal Labs, Princeton and NYU, studies how to allocate test-time compute across agents. The approach samples many small teams that share a forum and keeps the best team's result. Using Qwen3.8-27B with a budget of 100 agents, ten teams of ten beat 100 independent agents on 10 of 12 long-horizon tasks, and beat one team of 100 on all four tasks where that was run. A manager-led variant is also mentioned, but the snippet cuts off before giving its results.

AI-assisted summary based on the listed source.

A new paper by Junlin Wang, Haozhe Chen, Ang Li, Rahul Chalamala and Zhuang Liu (Duke, Modal Labs, Princeton, NYU) samples many small teams of agents that share a forum and keeps the best team's result. With Qwen3.8-27B and a budget of 100 agents, ten teams of ten beat 100 independent agents on 10 of 12...

Teams building agent systems may need to decide whether to split a fixed compute budget across many small teams rather than run lone agents or one large team. These are the paper's reported findings on a specific set of long-horizon tasks, so how well they carry over to other work is still open. Watch for the full paper and the manager-led variant results, which the snippet does not show.

Signal Strength 90% Technical label WATCH Public Interest 47 Category RESEARCH Reader Depth TECHNICAL

Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.

Public Interest components
Recognizable Entity Score 60 Practical Impact Score 8 Novelty Interest Score 94 Consequence Score 30 Curiosity Score 16 Shareability Score 59

VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to Developer Tools, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).