VQV Signal

DEVELOPING WATCH TECHNICAL

Quantized LFM3 1.7B model edges out AtomicChat version on EAR@10 in 38-hour search

According to a post on X by @bnjmn_marie, Benjamin Marie of The Kaitchup ran ISTA's Statistically-Lossless Quantization search on an RTX 3060 for 38 hours. The search mixed tensors from Liquid AI's and AtomicChat's GGUF files for Liquid's LFM3 1.7B. The resulting model scores 97.74% on EAR@10, a measure of how closely it matches the full model, versus 97.52% for AtomicChat's AD-Q6_K, both at 1.588 GB. Marie says the real-world difference may be small.

Source: Scobleizer News Pulse (X) · x.com Found via Robert Scoble’s Scobleizer News Pulse · a post on X, not independently verified Published 2026-11-02T01:45:00+00:00 Detected 2026-11-02T10:34:13+00:00
View original source

According to a post on X by @bnjmn_marie, Benjamin Marie of The Kaitchup ran ISTA's Statistically-Lossless Quantization search on an RTX 3060 for 38 hours. The search mixed tensors from Liquid AI's and AtomicChat's GGUF files for Liquid's LFM3 1.7B. The resulting model scores 97.74% on EAR@10, a measure of how closely it matches the full model, versus 97.52% for AtomicChat's AD-Q6_K, both at 1.588 GB. Marie says the real-world difference may be small.

AI-assisted summary based on the listed source.

Benjamin Marie (The Kaitchup) ran ISTA's Statistically-Lossless Quantization search on an RTX 3060 for 38 hours, mixing tensors from Liquid AI's and AtomicChat's GGUF files for Liquid's LFM3 1.7B. The result scores 97.74% EAR@10, a measure of how closely it matches the full model, against 97.52% for AtomicChat's...

For people running local LLM inference on consumer GPUs, this shows that automated search over quantized tensor mixes can shift benchmark scores at a fixed file size. The gap is 0.22 percentage points, and the author himself suggests it may not show up in practice. Readers should watch for independent evaluations before treating the model as a clear upgrade.

Signal Strength 78% Technical label WATCH Public Interest 25 Category DEVELOPING Reader Depth TECHNICAL

Signal Strength reflects source quality, relevance, freshness and evidence. Public Interest helps organize discovery; it is not proof of truth.

Public Interest components
Recognizable Entity Score 0 Practical Impact Score 18 Novelty Interest Score 70 Consequence Score 10 Curiosity Score 16 Shareability Score 44

VQV surfaced this signal because it is recent, relevant to LLM Inference, connected to Scobleizer News Pulse (X).